The call to Stand With Standing Rock is a call to hearts and minds everywhere.
Allies are needed at Standing Rock in North Dakota. Civil rights violations perpetrated by the Morton County Sheriff’s Department are escalating along with increased surveillance and militarized police aggression, while water, land and people are threatened by the Dakota Access Pipeline, and treaties made with First Nations have never been honored. I will head out with a small crew, to take a stand for Standing Rock, next Monday, October 24th, assuming my bronchitis eases up — don’t tell me, I know it’s cold out there — after helping with fundraising, action alerts, and shipments of sleeping bags, warm blankets and coats, first aid kits and herbal medicines requested by the medics at Standing Rock in September and October.
How can you help Standing Rock? First, stay informed: watch the Monday, October 17th 2016 Democracy Now episode where Amy Goodman films peaceful Water Protectors facing militarized police; interviews Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II, as well as Honor the Earth’s Winona LaDuke and Tara Houska: “Dakota Excess Pipeline? Standing Rock Protectors Strip-Searched, Jailed for Days on Minor Charges.”
Next, make four phone calls. Call Morton County Sherriff’s office (701) 667-3330 to demand the rights violations cease. Democracy Now reported this morning (link above) that the Morton County Sheriff’s department strip-searched the daughter of LaDonna Bravebull, the Sacred Stones Camp founder, in front of several male officers and left her naked in a freezing cold cell for hours. They asked her, “who’s your mother?” This sounds like torture, not community protection or upholding the law. Intimidation on behalf of Energy Transfer Partners, the company trying to build a massive Bakken Shale fracked oil pipeline just feet from the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, threatening the Missouri River and the reservation’s drinking water as well as every community downstream.
Next call North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple (701) 328-2200 and President Obama (202) 456-1111 or (202) 456-1414 to demand the Dakota Access Pipeline construction cease permanently and to demand an end to human rights abuses: protect the Water Protectors, don’t abuse them! Finally call the Army Corps of Engineers (202) 761-5903 to thank them for temporarily refusing the permit for the Dakota Access Pipeline to drill under the Missouri River, and to urge them to make that permanent.Because the construction is allowed only due to mis-use of the Nationwide Water Permit law, which allows legal fragmentation so that no Environmental Impact Statement has had to be created for the Dakota Access Pipeline, all construction activity is actually illegal as well as destructive to life, and must be stopped. Why should all this damage be done to sacred burial grounds, to the land and to people’s lives, when the pipeline will never be drilled under the Missouri River anyway? All construction must halt and permission to drill the Dakota Access Pipeline under the Missouri River must never be granted.
Expressions of solidarity with Standing Rock are extraordinary. It is a time to unify and celebrate as well as to stay informed, take action, donate, and resist.
Many Fronts: From Pilgrim Pipelines and Dakota Access Pipeline to Frontline Communities Everywhere
In this phase of the fight for climate justice, clean water and human rights, we need to become adept at working on several fronts simultaneously. The fight against the Dakota Access Pipeline’s East Coast counterpart, Pilgrim Pipelines — proposed to carry Bakken Shale crude out of Albany, NY brought to Albany from North Dakota’s fracking shalefields by oil “bomb trains,” — continues. Please prepare now to write your own public comments during the scoping phase of the New York State Environmental Quality Review, to begin imminently. Check the Coalition Against Pilgrim Pipelines website frequently, along with Riverkeeper, Scenic Hudson, and Protecting Our Waters, for updates.
We take leadership from indigenous people, people of color and frontline communities, which now also include massive numbers of white and middle-class communities. Frontline communities are those directly facing fracking, mountaintop removal, tar sands extraction impacts, spills and explosions from existing and new shale oil, dilbit, gasoline, fracked methane, and fracked NGL pipelines; polluting refineries, compressor stations and pump stations, export facilities on all our coasts, and bomb trains.
Ultimately, while the sheer number of frontline communities expands, we are one people in one struggle for a sane, liveable, humane future for ourselves and all species. The fight for dignity, sovereignty, human rights, climate justice, human and ecological health, and at the core, clean water, sacred water, at Standing Rock is everyone’s fight.
Follow Your Heart
You can donate directly to the Standing Rock Tribal Council here.
If you know me from my seven years’ anti-fracking and anti-pipelines work to protect water, health, climate, and human rights (or from my decades of work for nonviolence, against sexual assault; for peace, against racism, for indigenous peoples’ rights, before that), and would like to support this trip, please call (215) 840-6489 [cell] and (845) 687-7810 [land], to learn how to donate. Please leave your name and return call number(s) on both lines. I know it’s a pain, but we want to be secure and do not have a way to accept credit card donations. Thank you for considering supporting this little crew. Protecting Our Waters has been saying for 7 years that we — and you — are Protectors, a word now heard around the world as the Lakota Water Protectors hold the front line. The concept for the founding of Protecting Our Waters came directly from the Thirteen Indigenous Grandmothers, who said: “Protect something. Pick something — seeds, land, a species, a place, a waterway — and protect it.” It’s simply what we all need to do.
The call to Stand With Standing Rock is not just about action, money, or sharing online information. It’s also about prayer. The Standing Rock Tribal Council continues to ask everyone to send prayers. They are asking explicitly, they are asking continually, and they do not ask what tradition you come from or whether you’ve ever prayed before. Don’t know how to pray? Watch. Listen. And as Standing Rock Tribal Council member Cody Two Bears puts it, “Follow your heart.”
Rensselaer, NY: On Wednesday, July 20th the City of Rensselaer Common Council voted 5:0 to pass the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines, becoming the fourth and final city on the proposed oil and petroleum products pipelines’ direct route to oppose permitting or construction of the pipelines. The cities of Albany, Kingston and Newburgh had already passed Resolutions Opposing Pilgrim pipelines. The Common Council found opposition to Pilgrim pipelines running 21:1 in the city of Rensselaer.
Rensselaer is now the 28th Hudson Valley municipality (including towns, cities and villages but excluding counties) to pass a resolution opposing Pilgrim pipelines due to health, safety, environmental, drinking water, climate and energy policy, and economic concerns. The total proposed Pilgrim pipelines’ length, including laterals, is 352 miles in both states. Both proposed pipelines would be drilled horizontally underneath the Hudson River twice.
Common Council President Brian Stall commented, prior to the vote, “The area [of Rensselaer] along the port is heavily contaminated, DEC [New York State Department of Environmental Conservation] wouldn’t allow several tree stumps to be dug up there because it’s too contaminated. If DEC won’t allow tree stumps to be dug up, why would they allow huge pipelines to be drillled and dug there?”
Five voted “AYE” to the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines: James Van Vorst, John DeFrancesco, James Casey, Margaret Van Dyke, and Common Council President Brian Stall.
Two abstained: Dave Gardner, who said he “wanted to hear from DEC,” and Richard Mooney.
“We have an historic town. This river has shaped the lives of everyone who ever lived here,” said Rensselaer resident Joanne Kathleen Farrell, of Rensselaer Community Action, She told the Council, “There would be five times more oil trains if these Pilgrim pipelines are built, and Rensselaer is in the blast zone [for oil train explosions]. We fish, we boat and we picnic by the river. We may not be the richest, but we’re not tolerating this attack on our environment, our river and our city.”
“A pipeline like this leaks every 30 hours, according to federal data,” Reverend Barbara Toll, pastor of the United Church of Christ in Rensselaer, testified at the Common Council meeting. “Last year, a pipeline like this leaked 60,000 gallons of oil into the Yellowstone River. How much oil would leak, how much damage to the Hudson River would occur before we even know?”
“According to PHMSA [Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration], there have been 631 pipeline incidents per year for the past ten years,” Reverend Toll continued. “I don’t want this kind of risk for my congregation. Creation care is a faith issue for us. Our climate requires protection. We need a cleaner, healthier future for our grandchildren. In the City of Rensselaer, we can actually say no to this thing. Let’s say no tonight!”
By passing the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines, Rensselaer joins Albany and the towns of East Greenbush and Bethlehem in united opposition to the proposed Pilgrim pipelines throughout the Capital District, in every Capital District municipality along the direct proposed pipelines route. Several Capital District residents also spoke.
Tina Lieberman, an Albany resident, described and countered statements she said Pilgrim Pipeline Holdings LLC’s lobbyist in Albany, John Casellini, had made in Albany: “Casellini assured ‘the latest in anti-leak technology,’ but why are there so many leaks in new pipelines? It’s because sensors don’t go into effect until there’s a major drop in pressure. The Keystone pipeline leaked for a week before it was noticed — and then it took Transcanada ten more days to find the leak. Don’t be bamboozled!”
Lieberman added, “Casellini said in Albany there would be about four to five jobs in our area [with 40 – 50 pipeline jobs spread out from Albany to Linden, NJ]. We can create more, safer, good clean energy jobs. Don’t let them take away our air, our water, what we value most about living here!”
Peter Cook, Executive Director of NYS Council of Churches, representing over 7,000 congregations, testified at the Rensselaer Common Council, “I’m also a pastor for the United Church of Christ, which did a study showing that where people of color live and where there is a higher level of poverty, environmental harms proliferate, causing health harms. These pipelines represent disproportionate risk with no benefit. Please join 27 other cities, towns and villages in passing this Resolution tonight.”
Dave Publow, of neighboring Troy, said, “Pilgrim pipelines is a 19th century project using 20th century technology and does not meet 21st century needs. As to climate, we’re out of time. Each month is getting hotter than the last. There’s no reason for us to bear the brunt of these bomb trains running right next to African American and low-income neighborhoods. This project is toxic, and we need to stop it.”
At least eighteen people testified at the Common Council meeting. At least fourteen strongly opposed the Pilgrim pipelines.
Four people, including lobbyist John Casellini, testified in favor of the pipelines; at least two of those represented Local 190, calling for construction jobs.
Sue Rosenberg, of Coalition Against Pilgrim Pipelines-Saugerties, said, “We want good union jobs…. I know how hard it is. We need to create jobs building clean energy sources, to fix our bridges and railroads. We are downriver– so a breach in these pipelines would travel in a hurry to us.”
The controversial pair of proposed Pilgrim pipelines would carry Bakken Shale crude oil from Albany to Linden, NJ. Pilgrim’s construction would require an increase in oil train traffic into Albany threefold to fivefold, compared to the current (fluctuating) number of oil trains entering Albany, in order to service the southbound crude oil pipeline.
Riverkeeper documented the Rensselaer vote here: Capital Region Unanimously Opposes Pilgrim Oil Pipelines
Rensselaer, New York “We have to put our foot down,” said Pablo del Gallego, who literally had the last word at the City of Rensselaer’s Public Hearing on the proposed Pilgrim Pipelines this Wednesday, June 15th. “Oil is on the way out. Being a taxpayer, homeowner, etc. here, I don’t like these pipes, they will break and fail,” Pablo predicted. Rensselaer’s Common Council listened closely, having organized the Public Hearing to “take the pulse” of the community.
Rensselaer Common Council meetings normally draw three to five residents, but
residents packed the small City Hall to speak about the Pilgrim oil pipelines. Common Council President Brian Stall called for those in favor of the pipelines to speak first, and only one resident spoke in favor, hoping for construction jobs. Another construction trade union representative spoke next, also in favor; he was not a resident of Rensselaer.
Then 16 opponents of the proposed pipelines spoke, and it became clear that Rensselaer is an environmental justice community whose residents are deeply fed up with polluting industries being imposed on them.
Environmental Justice Rensselaer Style
Michelle, who identified herself as living near the co-generation plant, as part of her testimony opposing the pipelines, said, “I ask you to stop these Pilgrim pipelines. But I can see why a lot of people have given up. I’m tired, my health is failing, the fumes affect me day and night. My doctor said, ‘you don’t smoke enough to have emphysema.’ I have to close the windows, I can only sit outside at best 3, 4 times a week. Now if these Pilgrim Pipelines come, do I have to get rid of my house? I can’t leave my house to my kids with all this smoke and pollution from the cogeneration plant and the asphalt plant.”
Former Ward leader Marion Webber spoke in opposition to the proposed oil and petroleum products pipelines which would be drilled under the Hudson River from Albany, under the City of Rensselaer waterfront and under the city itself, if permitted. “Most of our children have asthma,” she said. “If there’s any money [from Pilgrim], I hope Rensselaer turns it down. We need to think about our future. We need to protect our city so our children have someplace to grow up into!”
A Harvard analysis, “OIL: the Life Cycle Analysis of its Health and Environmental Impacts,” supports Marion and others who commented about health impacts.
Another Rensselaer resident commented, “I moved here eight years ago to enjoy the waterfront and raise my children. But now with the industrial projects, trucks are shaking the house– I can’t even keep pictures straight on the walls. Please protect our environment and our community!”
“Bakken Crude is Notoriously Degrading to Pipeline Infrastructure”
Louis Sebesta, a resident of Partition Street in the City of Rensselaer, declared, “I oppose the Pilgrim Pipelines. They would carry Bakken crude oil, which is extremely corrosive and volatile. Bakken crude is notoriously degrading to pipeline infrastructure, leading to higher risk of pipeline leaks. And the construction alone would be devastating to our already hurting community. The trucks would be thundering, booming, dusty and degrading our already damaged air quality.”
Regarding the jobs argument, Louis said, “These jobs are boom-bust short-term jobs which go to out of town workers, pipeline jockeys, from the South and from Texas. And green jobs are highly labor intensive, unlike fossil fuel jobs. Green jobs are the jobs of our future.”
Many people, including Kate Hudson, Director of Cross-Watershed Initiatives for Riverkeeper, testified about the physical dangers and the extreme threats posed by drilling two pipelines– one would carry crude oil, and one would carry refined petroleum products — under the Hudson River twice.
“Pipelines spill three times as much oil as oil trains,” commented Hudson. “And oil trains would increase in order to service these pipelines. That affects Rensselaer because Rensselaer is within the blast zone for an oil train explosion.”
Kate Hudson pointed out that new pipelines leak at a tremendous rate: “The Keystone pipeline leaked 35 times in its first year of operation.”
Regarding the likelihood of leaks from the Pilgrim pipelines, Hudson said that “a 168,000 gallon leak is the best-case scenario,” based on the flow of oil and refined products through the pipelines. If not stopped instantaneously in the unlikely best-case scenario, she said, “the pipeline will be leaking at a rate of 357,000 gallons per hour.”
A Rensselaer resident put it poetically: “I believe the river is a gem to be protected, not a resource to be exploited.”
Rensselaer resident Deborah testified, “We are just starting to bring people back to the waterfront. Why put our river, our waterfront and our city at risk?”
Voices Not Present: “Your Children and My Grandchildren”
A crew of downriver Pilgrim pipelines opponents, including this blogger, walked the parks, cafes, streets and sidewalks of Rensselaer for several days prior to the hearing. The blue-collar community members’ most frequent response to the hearing invitation emerged, “I’m working two, three jobs. I’m working that night.”
In the face of a tough series of losses this community has already endured, the strong turnout and lively testimony at the hearing gave heart to residents who don’t feel their voices have been heard in the past. “OK, let’s have a meeting!” urged Marian, the former ward leader, on the sidewalk after the hearing. “Let’s decide what we’ve got to do!”
Some made phone calls or wrote to the Common Council to make their views known. Rensselaer is directly across the Hudson River from the City of Albany, which voted 9:0 in favor of the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines on May 16th, just one month before Rensselaer’s hearing.
The two cities are part of the Capitol District; their fates are linked. So Jeanette Rice, a resident of Rensselaerville across the river from Rensselaer, wrote the Common Council on June 15th to make sure they understand that climate matters:
To the Common Council, City of Rensselaer,The Pilgrim Pipelines proposal is contrary to the PSC plan to have NYS’s energy supply to be 50% fossil free by 2030. Your children and my grandchildren need to be protected from the impacts of climate change by your responsible actions. PLEASE reject the Pilgrim Pipeline proposal! Please take responsible actions and transition from fossil free fuels NOW.Remember all the explosions from this Bakkan oil. Please do not be rolled over by the promise of money/jobs when clean water, air, soil, life are at stake.We are coming up on the 3rd anniversary of the explosion in Lac Megantic, Quebec where 47 people were incinerated. Please DO NOT support this horror for Albany and Rensselaer. It is your responsibility.Just as we transitioned from sea oil to land oil in the 1850s, we are well beyond time to transition from land oil to renewables.Thank you.Jeannette P. RiceRensselaerville
On Wednesday night, June 15th 2016 in the City of Rensselaer, home to Monolith Solar and Garelick Farms among other successful businesses, it was Pablo del Gallego, sixteenth to testify, who had the last word.
“Look upon the future, not just one day, one year, ten years,” he told the Common Council. “We have to look further than that. We have to put our foot down.”
The Village of New Paltz and the Town of Rosendale, both in Ulster County, have asked New York State to divest the Pilgrim Pipelines from the state pension fund.
The campaign to divest from the proposed Pilgrim oil pipelines centers on Ares Management. The Ares EIF Management V account provides the funding for Pilgrim Pipeline Holdings LLC, a Connecticut-based corporation whose principals are both former Koch Industries executives, to move forward with its work — including heavy lobbying in six New York counties and aggressive landman tactics in at least five counties — to get permits for their proposed pipelines while setting the stage for eminent domain taking of private property.
About 95 miles of the pipelines’ proposed route would be along the New York State Thruway, I-87, while about 25 miles of the pipelines’ route in New York State would go through private property.
The Town of Rosendale passed its resolution last week. The Tuesday June 7th Daily Freeman quoted Rosendale Councilwoman Jen Metzger describing their rationale for the action. Metzger said the Ares EIF Management V account should not be part of a taxpayer-funded portfolio:
“The state Comptroller has exercised his authority in the past in an effort to ensure that the practices of companies benefiting from State pension fund investments are more consistent with the public interest,” she said.
“Comptroller (Thomas) DiNapoli has been particularly vocal about climate and environmental issues,” Metzger said. “We wanted to put the Pilgrim pipelines project on his radar and urge him to take a hard look at funds being used to back a crude oil pipeline project that a number of municipalities participating in the state retirement system have formally opposed. This project directly contradicts state clean energy goals and puts our local communities and resources at unnecessary risk.”
Pilgrim’s two proposed pipelines would be drilled under the Hudson River twice and would be drilled under or through 232 other waterways, threatening drinking water for millions. As proposed, the southbound pipeline would carry 200,000 barrels per day of Bakken Shale crude oil, requiring a fivefold increase in the number of oil “bomb trains” coming into Albany every day to service the pipelines, which would run between Albany and Linden, New Jersey. The northbound pipeline would carry refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and kerosene. The flow of the northbound pipeline could be reversed, and the type of fuel carried in each pipeline changed, after permitting and construction.
Pilgrim has no known contracts with refineries in the Linden area, leading to speculation that the pipelines could be used primarily for export, whether from the beginning or later. It became legal to export U.S. – produced crude oil last fall thanks to intense lobbying by the Koch Brothers, among other major players.
Community to Council: “We Aim to Stop These Pipelines”
The City of Albany Common Council voted on Monday, May 16th to oppose the Pilgrim oil pipelines, two proposed pipelines which would begin and end in Albany, New York. A standing-room-only crowd, 18 of whom testified against what one speaker called the “preposterous Pilgrim pipelines,” packed into City Hall at 7 PM. The energetic crowd, including Ezra Prentice Homes residents, faith leaders, union members, health professionals, and environmental and climate justice advocates, toughed it out in the increasingly warm and airless chamber until the vote was called at 11:15 PM. “That was a real nail-biter,” commented Albany resident Roger Downs, Conservation Chair, Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter, after the vote. Downs had been the first to testify in favor of the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines, more than four hours earlier.
“I’ve never seen as grave an injustice as I’ve seen at Ezra Prentice Homes,” testified Willie White, AVillage Executive Director, referring to the residents in a predominantly African American neighborhood in Albany’s South End, where oil trains rumble 30 feet from a children’s playground while off-gassing from the Global facility and oil trains has led to negative health impacts. “We’ve already got the oil trains, hundreds of diesel trucks, Route 787, Global’s oil heating facility… It’s a travesty. If we really take a moral look at this, it’s not just a dollar bill, it’s people’s lives. We have a right to clean water too, clean air too, and we aim to stop these pipelines.”
Time-Warner Cable posted video of Willie White speaking during the extraordinary Common Council meeting: Albany Common Council Opposes Pilgrim Pipelines.
“We Should Not Increase the Risk”
The oil trains currently carrying about 35,000 barrels per day into Albany would “quintuple” in order to service the Pilgrim oil pipelines if they were to be built, according to research presented by Stephen Shafer, MD, MPH, to the Common Council.
Albany resident Gregory Bell told the Council, “Albany is struggling financially. From a budget perspective, any substantial spill or exploding rail car would be too costly. The Kalamazoo [River in Michigan] cleanup has cost $3 billion so far, and it’s not over. The cleanup cost in Lac Megantic [Canadian town destroyed by an oil train explosion] is $2.7 billion so far. Should Pilgrim pipelines be built, we would see a four to six times increase in oil train quantity here. We should not increase the risk. This Council should pass this Resolution.”
Sitting in rows, standing wherever space appeared, and even sitting on the tile floor, community members clapped frequently after residents’ testimony, despite repeated admonishments from the Council leadership not to clap.
It’s Our Health: Environmental Racism and City-Wide Impacts
Health concerns and environmental racism related to the proposed Pilgrim oil pipelines took center stage throughout much of the night.
Portia Gaddy, an Ezra Prentice resident for 15 years, said, “I want to be part of the Committee to stop the pipelines, part of the work, because I’m going through health issues. I’ve got children, grandchildren with asthma. I love my surroundings but I can’t live with my surroundings… I’m a victim, I’m affected. Everywhere you turn, there’s trains.”
The fourth person to testify, Deneen Carter-El, an Ezra Prentice Homes resident, said, “My biggest concern is the health problems: cancer, asthma, respiratory, sinus. I’ve lived there over 20 years, and I don’t want this in my backyard. Trains are running again despite the [Breakfree Albany] rally and I don’t want them any more. We have thousands of residents: elders, children, people with disabilities.”
Two days before the Albany Common Council vote, 2,000 people rallied in Albany to “break free” from fossil fuels, with 500 marching through the Ezra Prentice Homes neighborhood in solidarity and support, hundreds more risking arrest on the bomb train tracks at the Global facility where Pilgrim pipelines would begin and end. Five were arrested while blocking an oil bomb train in Guilderland, just north of Albany.
The Reverend Peter Cook, Albany resident and Executive Director of the New York State Council of Churches, which serves over 7,000 congregations, asked the Albany Common Council to pass the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim pipelines. “A much greater volume of oil would flow, with more trains. The pipelines pose a tremendous risk to waterways. It would be profoundly unjust… I was a pastor with the United Church of Christ, which did a groundbreaking study of environmental racism. Those communities which have no political clout or money are hurt the worst. We must value the diversity of our community. We must care for each other.”
Delora Bascombe, a community health outreach worker, testified that she was “also here as a mother, citizen, neighbor, and member of the SUNY academic community in the field of public health. The VOCs — volatile organic chemicals — which would increase if Pilgrim pipelines were to be built, would impact South End residents acutely but would affect the whole City of Albany due to thermal inversion,” she said. “Thermal inversion is what happens when poisons released into the atmosphere settle over our entire city, and that would impact everyone in this room,” she explained.
Reverend McKenzie Johnson, speaking fourteenth, asserted, “Areas of the South End are under attack. We are being attacked by greed, by indecision, by air, by land, and now with the Pilgrim pipelines, by both. Even brand new pipelines leak; corrosion starts quickly. It’s not the inspectors that find the leaks, it’s a passerby that found the last major oil pipeline leak.” Emphasizing Albany’s high-density population in the South End, McKenzie said that compared to the oil train explosion in Lac Megantic, which killed 47 people, “if an explosion happens here, 1000 or more people could be killed.” In terms of oil leaks, he said, “Pilgrim pipelines would be worse than trains or trucks. Vote YES on the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim.”
Full disclosure: this blogger also testified. “I organize with the Coalition Against Pilgrim Pipelines-NY, and we are working with 38 municipalilties along the direct route of the proposed Pilgrim pipelines. Albany would be hurt the worst, in five ways. There would be a five-fold increase in oil trains coming into Albany, but the DEC might segment their environmental review, taking no notice of the oil trains increase. The pipelines would be drilled right under the Hudson River twice, threatening the Albany waterfront for 40-80 years. First responders in Albany would be stressed and stretched to respond to an oil bomb train explosion, pipeline spill or other emergency Pilgrim pipelines might create. Environmental justice communities, such as Ezra Prentice Homes, have already had more than they can take but would be hit hard by Pilgrim. And in terms of air quality, Albany is already out of compliance with federal ozone regulations.
“In the big picture, everyone’s health is at risk, from cradle to grave, from fracking and flaring, trains and pipelines, to refining which makes people sick, to the end use, which increases climate chaos. Oil use in New York State is declining,” this blogger concluded, “so we don’t need these oil pipelines.”
Jobs, Water, and the Big Picture: All This for Four Jobs?
“We need more jobs with sustainable energy instead of hurting already overburdened communities of color,” said Albany resident Jessica, the tenth to testify. “Pilgrim Pipelines would create only 50 permanent jobs in all of New York and New Jersey, with maybe four of those jobs in Albany. Those are specialized jobs, so they would probably bring in people from out of state. There’s no justification for the harms Pilgrim pipelines would bring to human health, our economy, water, properties, and wildlife.”
“I oppose the Pilgrim pipelines and agree with all who spoke. I want to stress the water,” said Albany Resident Carol, the 13th to testify. “In Hoosic Falls, in Flint, and all around the world, water is being poisoned. Over 200 bodies of water would be drilled through by the Pilgrim Pipelines. Let’s get smart about the value of our water and say NO.”
Both Pilgrim Pipeline Holdings LLC’s President and Vice President are former Koch Industries executives. In 2000, Koch Industries received what was at that time the biggest fine in EPA history, when the EPA aggregated together 300 of their oil pipeline spills and fined Koch Industries $30 million.
“I am a member of the teachers’ union, the American Federation of Teachers; the National Education Association; and an AFL-CIO local, so I am a sibling with my fellow union members here,” began Mary Finneran, a Cairo resident who spoke out of her experience. “I just found out my childhood home… was toxic. After Corning left, working class buildings were built on that poisoned site; my mother had terrible asthma, my brother had learning disabilities and nosebleeds,” said Finneran. “This is not normal. I can just imagine the children at Ezra Prentice starting to think their health impacts are normal, but it’s not. Can we blame anyone here who allows the Pilgrim pipelines without taking future health risks into consideration? Yes. We can.”
The 16th speaker, Bill Walsh of the Capitol Region Building Trades, engineers’ union, and Teamsters, was the first and only speaker who expressed reservations about the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines. “We haven’t had time to look into it,” Walsh said. “Many people here tonight have specific data, and pertinent information, but it’s not adequate information. I ask that you table this Resolution so we can have our point of view heard.”
“Real Democracy is Messy”
Things got even more interesting after Bill Walsh’s testimony. Chris, the 17th speaker, said he has lived, worked and raised children in Albany since 1973. “Thank you for extending the comment period,” he made a point of appreciating the Common Council for their decision to extend the comment period for another hour after 9 PM. “Real democracy is messy,” he commented.
Chris described what it took to successfully defeat a medical waste incinerator and a high sulfur coal plant in Albany. He said that Albany’s history of successfully repelling toxic projects shows the industry assaults ceased when “word got out we are well organized.”
Now, Chris said, the Capitol District is being targeted anew for environmentally toxic industries because “we are seen as being desperate and poor.”
“The oil trains and pipelines and tar sands heating facility — all are connected,” he said. “The floodgates are open. Oil trains, Pilgrim pipelines are just as bad [as earlier toxic projects], another form of environmental racism,” he observed.
Drawing a lesson from the past, Chris commented, goes against tabling the Resolution or being slow to act. “The way we defeated those projects was, the Mayor came out strong. Unless you put your foot down and stand with the Mayor,” he implored the Council, “we can’t do it without all of you.”
Word on the street, going into the contentious four-hour meeting, had been that a group of Councilmembers planned to vote “No,” or abstain from voting “Yes,” on the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim pipelines not on principle, but because they didn’t want to vote “for” a resolution Mayor Kathy Sheehan supports. As in, petty power politics.
Diana Wright, representing People of Albany United for Safe Energy (PAUSE), pointed out that “Governor Cuomo banned fracking due to health and environmental impacts. We are already being affected by combustion of fossil fuels. I can’t imagine a more pressing issue,” she said. “Breakfree was momentous: people came from as far away as Oregon, Canada, and Minnesota to attend Breakfree Albany, and we are all together, white and people of color. Now we have an historic chance to stop a pair of new fracked fossil fuel pipelines,” she concluded.
Finally, Tina Lieberman, a resident of Albany’s 14th Ward, was the 19th and final speaker, since many of the 30 who had signed up to testify had gone home. “The Pilgrim pipelines would deeply impact my quality of life. The Pilgrim pipelines representative is very clear that their goal is to reach their carrying capacity of 200,000 barrels per day, per pipeline, for two pipelines. But remember 2014? Those trains were snaking around everywhere. It was beginning to look like an industrial wasteland. 2014 was just 100,000 barrels per day! You want twice that?”
“I heard a Lac Megantic survivor,” Tina said, describe what it was like when 47 people were instantly incinerated by a huge fireball. “The blast zone is half a mile, and taxpayers would foot the bill,” she said. “This is the time to take a stand. Tabling this Resolution is as good as a No vote, and we will hold you accountable. We expect to see you take responsibility to protect Albany, and vote Yes for the Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines.”
After another hour of speeches, the Common Council did pass the Resolution, with nine votes Yes, zero votes No, and six votes “Present.” The bizarre “present” votes are abstentions from Councilmembers (who may have been swayed by the intense pressure from John Casselini, Pilgrim’s well-connected lobbyist in Albany, for weeks leading up to the vote) who might like to avoid the wrath of their constituents by, well, at least not voting “no” on the resolution opposing the pipelines.
If that quadruple negative is confusing, you can find partial explanations and a complete breakdown of who voted which way in the Albany’s newspaper, the Times Union. Even the regular press found the “present” votes “weird”:
On Friday May 13th, two days before the vote, about 50 kayak-wielding activists took a few hours to defend the cities of Albany and Rensselaer from the new wave of fossil fuel infrastructure threatening the Hudson River, including the Pilgrim pipelines and its associated increase in oil “bomb trains.” Maybe you don’t have the stamina for hours-long legislative meetings to defend your homes, your water, and your lives? You can also get out on the river to take a stand.
Twenty-six New York Municipalities Stand Up to Big Oil
The nine-to-nothing vote made Albany the 26th municipality in New York State to pass Resolutions Opposing Pilgrim pipelines, joining the Town of Bethlehem in Greene County and the Village and Town of Woodbury in Orange County among the most recent additions to the list.
The two pipelines, proposed by a corporation whose two principals are both former Koch Industries executives, would carry Bakken Shale oil and/or tar sands dilbit south from Albany to Linden, New Jersey. In Linden, no refinery has yet signified any desire or ability to handle the massive 200,000 barrels per day carrying capacity of the Pilgrim pipelines, suggesting to DeSmogBlog that export may be the pipelines’ primary purpose.
A second pipeline would run northbound, parallel to and in the same ditch as the crude oil pipeline, expected to carry gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene, heating oil and diesel. However, Pilgrim representatives have admitted the northbound pipeline’s flow could be reversed and it could be repurposed to carry just about anything, including more crude oil, southbound for marine terminals.
Once in the ground, local communities – and possibly even state and national governments, if international export contracts are signed, due to the trend of current trade treaties to give supranational powers to corporations – would have no control over what corporation might maintain the pipelines, whether they are indemnified, what is put into the pipelines, where the fuel comes from, how it is extracted, where it is shipped, nor any meaningful way to limit the pipelines’ long-term health, safety, environmental, climate and social justice impacts.
The Last Word: “A Unified Message to the Pipeline Companies”
The Reverend Marc Johnson, Associate Pastor, Greater St. John’s Church, commented after the Albany victory, “By passing this resolution it sets the tone for our community and city that we don’t want the pipelines to be installed at any time! We send a unified message to the pipeline companies from the beginning that they are not welcomed here. If an issue is killed at the root, we don’t have to worry about about the production of the fruit.”
On January 12th, 2016 the New Paltz Town Board again took a strong stand to defend New Paltz against the proposed Pilgrim pipelines, voting unanimously to approve sending the following letter asking that the New York State Thruway Authority be removed from their proposed role as co-lead agency for the environmental review of Pilgrim pipelines. New Paltz asked that DEC be sole lead agency, and re-affirmed their opposition to the two pipelines ever being built. Board members read the letter aloud for the public record, as follows:
January 12, 2016
BY CERTIFIED MAIL
The Hon. Basil Seggos
Acting Commissioner, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation
Albany, New York 12233-1010
Dear Commissioner Seggos:
The Town of New Paltz, as you may be aware, passed a Resolution Opposing Pilgrim Pipelines last year due to the unacceptable impacts these pipelines would have on public health, safety, climate, drinking water, streams and rivers, economic well-being, and more. In keeping with the leadership role New Paltz is taking to defend our community against the proposed controversial Pilgrim pipelines, and in keeping with at least 28 other New York towns, villages, cities and counties working together to protect our communities, we request that you resolve the dispute over co-lead agency by removing the Thruway Authority from its proposed shared lead agency role.
Pursuant to New York State’s State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) regulations, the Town of New Paltz hereby submits our formal request to NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Segos to resolve the dispute over the designation of lead agency for the Pilgrim Pipeline Project. 6 NYCRR section 617.6(b)(5).
Two involved agencies, the New York State Thruway Authority and DEC’s Acting General Counsel proposed, on Dec. 21, 2015, that they serve as co-lead agency for the SEQR review of the proposed Pilgrim pipelines project. The City of Kingston, an involved agency, has now expressed its disagreement with and refusal to consent to this co-lead agency proposal by letter dated January 4, 2016, from its Mayor Steven Noble to DEC Commissioner Seggos and Robert Megna, Executive Director of the Thruway Authority, and by letter dated January 7, 2016, transmitting the resolution of its City Council to the same effect to Commissioner Seggos.
In addition, the Town of Rosendale, also an involved agency, has communicated to Commissioner Seggos, by letter dated January 6, 2016, that it remains committed to DEC and not the Thruway Authority as the sole lead agency for the proposed Pilgrim Pipelines project.
In addition, the Town of New Paltz, with this letter, also opposes the Thruway Authority being included in the lead agency role, and requests that DEC alone act as lead agency.
The refusals of the City of Kingston and towns of Rosendale and New Paltz to consent to the Thruway Authority and DEC’s Dec. 21, 2015 co-lead agency proposal mean that involved agencies are unable to agree on which lead agency will be lead and therefore any involved agency may request, by certified mail, that the DEC Commissioner designate the lead agency for this project. 6 NYCRR section 617.6(b)(5)(i). The Town of New Paltz hereby makes that request.
The Town of New Paltz is an involved agency because portions of the Pilgrim pipelines project are proposed to be constructed within the boundaries of the town and local approvals are necessary before that construction could take place. The Town is identified as an involved agency in Pilgrim Pipeline Holding, LLC’s preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement dated August 2015 (page ES-&).
The New Paltz Town Board, on November 19, 2015, unanimously approved our offer to act as Lead Agency for the SEQR review of the proposed Pilgrim pipelines. We sent that offer, along with our stated opposition to NYSTA as lead agency, to the DEC on November 19, 2015.
Information relevant to the Commissioner’s application of the designation criteria that are enumerated in the SEQR regulations at 6 NYCRR section 617.6(b)(5)(v) is presented below.
Per the requirements of the SEQR regulations, we are sending this request for the Commissioner to resolve the lead agency disagreement on the Pilgrim Pipelines project by designating the lead agency to all the Involved Agencies along the proposed Pilgrim pipelines’ route in New York State, and are hereby informing them that all comments they may want to submit with respect to the Commissioner’s designation must be submitted to him within 10 calendar days of their receipt of our request.
The Town of New Paltz, consistent with its resolution of November 19, 2015, remains firm in its belief that the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), and not the NYS Thruway Authority (NYSTA), is the only appropriate agency to serve as lead in the environmental review of the proposed Pilgrim pipelines project. The Town, moreover, has significant concerns about the proposal for co-lead agency, and does not offer its consent for the following reasons.
It has been the policy of the DEC to discourage co-lead agency of SEQR processes, and the Town does not see how this case merits an exception. The NYS DEC website states that, “the purpose of having a lead agency is to coordinate the SEQR process so that when an action is to be carried out, funded or approved by two or more agencies, a single integrated environmental review is conducted. This lead agency is responsible for making key SEQR determinations during the review process”—a task made potentially much more difficult when two different agencies are granted joint discretionary authority. The DEC has the appropriate mission, jurisdiction, resources, and expertise to exercise a proper and thorough environmental review of this proposed project.
It is the opinion of the New Paltz Town Board that the criteria for a lead agency determination strongly favor DEC. These criteria, in order of importance, include: 1) whether the impacts are of local, regional, or state-wide significance; 2) which agency has the broadest powers of investigation of the environmental impacts; and 3) which agency has the best capacity to provide a thorough environmental assessment.
With regard to the first and second criteria, the proposed Pilgrim pipelines project involves numerous potential impacts to resources of local, regional, and state-wide concern, many of which are within DEC’s regulatory jurisdiction. These include the Hudson River and such important tributaries as the Rondout, Esopus, and Catskill Creeks and Wallkill River, the Ramapo River Watershed, State-regulated wetlands, the Karst Aquifer Region (a priority project designated in the NYS Open Space Conservation Plan), Harriman State Park, and other resources that the DEC is responsible for protecting, including, possibly, endangered species (the Karst Aquifer Region, for example, provides critical habitat to the federally-listed Indiana Bat).
In addition, a proposed project to construct the first crude oil pipeline in New York must be evaluated within the context of the State’s broader climate goals and the New York State Energy Plan. Governor Cuomo has expressed his intention for New York to serve as a national leader in addressing climate change, and the DEC has statewide responsibility for climate change mitigation. The Commissioner’s Policy mandates that DEC must consider climate change in all its actions, including permitting.
In his letter of December 21, 2015, declaring NYSTA as co-lead agency, NYSTA Executive Director Robert Megna argues that the common regional jurisdictions of the two involved agencies are a basis for co-lead agency. We strongly disagree. NYSTA’s jurisdiction, while crossing numerous municipal boundaries, is confined narrowly to use and occupancy of its own property. NYSTA has no jurisdiction over the many environmental and community resources that are potentially put at risk by this project in the event of a spill or other major project impact. The potential impacts of even a relatively small spill could have serious consequences for a community or communities through which the Thruway runs, if it contaminates an aquifer or water body.
By contrast, the NYS DEC’s governmental powers of investigation in review of this project are broad, as illustrated by Acting Deputy Commissioner and General Counsel Thomas Berkman in his letter of Dec. 21, 2015, to NYSTA Executive Director Robert Megna:
A preliminary review of the application indicates there is the potential for significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of the pipeline, including but not limited to, impacts to hundreds of acres of forest, regulated waterbodies and wetlands. The Project, as proposed, would implicate the Department’s permitting authority pursuant to the Environmental Conservation Law and the federal Clean Water Act.
Both the first and second criteria for determination of lead agency contained in the SEQR regulations strongly favor DEC.
With regard to the third criteria—the relative expertise of involved agencies—the DEC clearly has the greater breadth and depth of expertise needed for this review. NYSTA’s knowledge of highway use and regulation and traffic impacts, while important, is highly limited within the context of a complex environmental review covering surface and groundwater, soils, bedrock and geology, stormwater, air quality, habitat, and climate, among other areas of specialized knowledge and expertise. In past lead agency disputes on energy projects, the DEC Commissioner has pointed to the Department’s large staff of professionals with unique expertise in the many areas of potential environmental impact as favoring DEC lead agency. The same holds true for this project.
The rationales for NYSTA lead agency status and for co-lead agency are not compelling, and could undermine confidence in the SEQR review process. Twenty-nine villages, towns, cities and counties municipalities that are considered “potential involved agencies” have already expressed their opposition to NYSTA serving as lead agency and their strong support for DEC serving in this capacity instead.
We urge the Commissioner to designate the NYS DEC as lead agency to oversee the critical environmental review for this multi-jurisdictional project.
Neil Bettez, Supervisor
Daniel Torres, Deputy Supervisor
Jeff Logan, Councilman
Marty Irwin, Councilman
Julie Seyfert-Lillis, Councilwoman
Cc: Robert Megna, Executive Director of the New York Thruway Authority, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Treasury—Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline & Haz. Materials Safety Admin, N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, N.J. Department of Transportation, involved agency municipalities.
Coalition Against Pilgrim Pipelines – New York (CAPP-NY) www.stoppilgrimpipeline.com
For Immediate Release: December 11, 2015
As New York towns confront Pilgrim’s proposed pipelines, Pilgrim’s claim that pipelines would benefit climate called “whopper” by author, national climate leader Bill McKibben
In the past three weeks, at least fifteen towns and cities in New York State have made public, transparent commitments — the majority with unanimous votes at Board meetings — to oppose the New York State Thruway Authority’s attempt to act as Lead Agency for the environmental review of the proposed Pilgrim pipelines.
The cities of Albany and Kingston; the county of Ulster; and the towns of Athens, Bethlehem, Catskill, Coxsackie, Harriman, Newburgh, New Paltz, New Windsor, Plattekill, Ramapo, Rosendale, and Saugerties are now standing up to what Harriman Mayor Steve Welle called a “fox guarding henhouse” attempt by the Thruway Authority to fast-track approval for Pilgrim pipelines’ permit.
Pilgrim has recently tried to head off this opposition with a press campaign claiming that their proposed crude oil and gasoline/diesel/jet fuel (refined products) pipelines would be “good for climate”—an assertion that has met with widespread criticism.
Well-known author and international leader on climate issues Bill McKibben said of Pilgrim’s claim: “The idea that new oil pipelines would be ‘good for the climate’ is Orwellian. At this point, with the price of renewable energy plummeting, the thing that would be good for the climate, and consumers, is an end to new fossil fuel infrastructure designed to extend the oil age a few more decades. We know from the recent Exxon revelations that oil companies don’t always tell the truth, but this one is a whopper.”
Jen Metzger, Rosendale Town Board member, said, “Pilgrim’s analysis completely ignores the most significant climate impacts of their proposed project: These pipelines would add capacity to refine more and more crude oil, not just for east coast markets but for export, encouraging continued growth in fossil fuel consumption and its dangerous impacts on the global climate.”
Metzger pointed out that the rationale for rejecting these pipeline is no different from the federal government’s decision to reject the Keystone Pipeline: The pipelines would encourage expansion of GHG intensive fuel products for the long term, undermining our role as a leader in moving to a low-carbon economy.
“It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that introducing new crude oil infrastructure with a 100-year life span to New York State is completely at odds with New York State’s energy goals,” Metzger continued.
Kate Hudson, Riverkeeper’s Director for Cross-Watershed Initiatives, said that Pilgrim’s premises on climate are incorrect on two levels: “One, building the pipelines would not mean that barge traffic would come off the river. There is no guarantee, nothing that would require it. If the crude oil export ban is lifted, crude will continue to move by barge, rail and the pipelines (if they are built), leading to an increase in greenhouse gases associated with transport, NOT a decrease!
“Two, Pilgrim’s study fails to count the greenhouse gas emissions that would result from the oil that its pipelines would transport being burned! The greenhouse gas effect of building an expensive piece of fossil fuel infrastructure in the present that would last 50 plus years would lock us into taking that fossil fuel out of the ground and burning it decades into the future, decades of greenhouse gas emissions. Unless curbed, greenhouse gas emissions will drive our planet over the edge of climate change.
Hudson concluded, “Theoretical differences between the greenhouse gas emissions of various forms of transport evaporate in the face of the additional greenhouse gas emissions that would result from the inevitable burning of all the fuel transported by Pilgrim’s proposed pipelines.”
Thus far, fifty-eight towns in New York and New Jersey have passed resolutions which oppose the pipelines altogether. Copies of the resolutions, along with Pilgrim’s maps of the project, FAQs, and news, are here: www.stoppilgrimpipelines.com
I am grateful for activists everywhere who stand up for justice, peace, and for the earth.
News in recent days has led me to reflect upon the commonality of the lived experience of fear, sadness and defiance — the lack of safety and the sense of betrayal — whether you are a Black student at the University of Missouri who finds an image of a lynched Black woman hanging on your door as a “joke,” or whether you are a resident of Paris, reeling from recent attacks and steeling yourself for the potential for more as COP21 approaches. Whether you are a resident of Mali, a resident of the U.S. who happens to be a Muslim, or an undocumented person living in the Rio Grande valley, at the core of these experiences is vulnerability, body and soul.
Perhaps you are a Chicago resident linking arms, again, at a peaceful, angry, determined #BlackLivesMatter rally after the release of the video showing that 13 of the 15 seconds of shooting at a living teenager, 17 years old, took place while he was lying on the ground, helpless, shot in the back: an execution.
Or perhaps you are a Minnesota activist who came to a Black Lives Matter rally only to find yourself running away from masked shooters, with your young son, who is shot and bleeding. And there in Minneapolis, a police officer, doing nothing to stop the violence, states, “That’s what you all wanted, right?”
No, dear man, dear police officer sworn to protect our safety, that is not what we wanted.
Not more death, more terror, more bullets and more blood.
Not more executions. Not more acts of violence, whether by police officers, fundamentalists, power-hungry sociopaths, oil and gas corporations, or anyone else.
The courage of every person who shows up in the flesh, linking arms to stand publicly for what we want, increases our safety, our collective commitment to decency, dignity, justice, and human rights.
Sure, activists aren’t perfect. Stupid, dehumanizing slogans have been chanted recently by protesters angry at police for so many killings. Activists are human too: sometimes perfectionist and sometimes sloppy; sometimes inspiring and sometimes flopping.
But the activists I know — and I know thousands — are generally people I see as the best of the best: creative, soulful, determined, smart, and unstoppable. Not every one of us is a Ken Saro Wiwa, a Wangari Maathai, an Aung San Suu Kyi, a John Lewis, a Julian Bond, a Tim DeChristopher or a Michelle Alexander. But we all matter.
So on this Thanksgiving, my thanks go to protesters, to the liberators everywhere working for peace, equity, and a liveable planet.
Energy and Activism
In the energy wars, protesters confront the rogue addicts and liars, the polluters and destroyers purveying the greatest violence against climate we have ever seen: Exxon Mobil and Koch Industries, the #2 and #1 funders of climate denial networks in the world.
Without a liveable planet, we can have no decency, dignity, justice, human rights or safety. Thank you, New York attorney general Schneiderman, for investigating Exxon’s role in burying research and funding climate denial. Thank you, exposers of Koch Industries for their even larger role in consolidating the sway of oil and gas profiteers at the expense of millions of lives.
Meanwhile, protesters have also mobilized in fabulously creative ways against extreme energy this year. To protect our climate, air, food, wildlife and health takes increasing resilience and energy — energy of the human kind. The First Nations people, in particular the Unist’ot’en Camp, who’ve moved not just their bodies, but their homes, to live 24/7 on the proposed route of an unwanted pipeline. The ferocious resistance to the Port Ambrose LNG export facility: we won that one! Landowners in Pennsylvania and West Virginia fighting desperate battles against Sunoco Logistics, whose Mariner East pipelines would export fracked natural gas liquids overseas from the Delaware River.
And thousands of New York and New Jersey residents who are fighting for their lives against the proposed oil and refined products “evil twin” pipelines proposed by Pilgrim Holdings, LLC. This “Keystone of the East” would triple the oil bomb trains coming into Albany in order for Pilgrim to profit from their Bakken Shale oil and/or, ultimately, tar sands dilbit pipeline.
Who are the principals in this little heard-of corporation? Two former Koch Industries leading executives are the President and Vice President of Pilgrim. The shady corporation has, among other things, filed their application to use the New York State Thruway Rights of Way for their proposed dirty, dangerous two pipelines — 356 miles of pipe — and then claimed that there is “no fire risk” from 356 miles of pipeline which they say would carry Bakken Shale crude southbound and jet fuel, gasoline, kerosene northbound between Linden, NJ and Albany, NY. In short, Pilgrim claims to have figured out how to make Bakken Shale oil and refined products… like magic! … non-flammable.
With such deep pockets, willingness to lie, and magical powers, it’s no wonder the hubris of Pilgrim Pipeline LLC has led them to propose the beginning of construction of their pipelines on April 1, 2016. The joke is on them: that is Fossil Fools Day. Their absurd construction timeline has them conducting “surveys” — you know, for easy to find things like endangered and threatened species in 6 counties of New York State alone — for a mere 5 days before commencing “clearing” — you know, vast and fast cutting of trees — on April 6th, 2016. April Fools, Pilgrim Holdings LLC: your pipelines will never be built.
Dispersed, Yet Collective
Because extreme energy projects are dispersed all over North America, few of the protest actions make the national news at all, unless it’s so massive, colorful, relevant and urgent — think kayaktivists confronting Shell in Seattle — that it actually makes the New York Times for a few seconds. But we know the work of confronting extreme energy is hard, continual, sometimes exhausting and, well, extreme. The Unist’ot’en people, or the people of Louisiana, can tell you that. Just like the work for #BlackLivesMatter, with life and death consequences depending on how well we do our change-agent work.
That’s why my thanks this year goes to protesters. Quiet or loud, episodic or relentless, using the multitudes of our bodies to tell our story or, in contrast, like the spoken word artist Prince Ea whose video, “Man vs. Earth,” has recently gone viral — telling the story of the multitudes with one powerful voice — I thank you all.
Facing Our History, Facing Our Future
In closing, here are two quotes — one looking backward and one looking forward. Perhaps it’s not coincidence that my gratefulness to activists starts with #BlackLivesMatter protesters, and solidarity with protesters — and moves to the activists in the fight over clean energy, which is to say the fight over whether we will continue to destroy the planet’s climate and life support systems, or change. Looking back, we see that we have never faced our past. Looking forward, we can still create a life-saving, positive future — but only if we face reality. So here in the facing reality department:
“Noam Chomsky sees it [Black Lives Matter movement] as a response to the unresolved consequences of slavery and racism dating back hundreds of years,” says Democracy Now host Amy Goodman on March 3, 2015:
“[Slavery] is a large part of the basis for our wealth and privilege,” Chomsky says. “Is there a slave museum in the United States? The first one is just being established now with a private donor. This is the core of our history along with the extermination and expulsion of the native population. But it’s not part of our consciousness.”
And the forward-looking quote is from Mark Jacobson on EcoWatch, from November 24th 2015:
“I hope that the 139 country roadmaps, together with a just-published grid integration study for the U.S., will give confidence to leaders of the world that going to 100 percent clean, renewable energy for all purposes will not only provide reliable power at low cost, but will also create 22 million more jobs worldwide than it will cost, reduce international conflict over fuels because each country will largely be energy independent, reduce terrorism risk by providing more distributed power, eliminate the 4-7 million air pollution deaths annually worldwide and eliminate global warming,” said Mark Jacobson, Stanford University professor and main author of the report.
Thanks to activists, there is hope. Hope is the wellspring of action. Sure, we can and must act when we do not feel hope. When I am on the frontlines, I’m often feeling something much closer to despair than to hope. But when I look at images of other activists all around the world standing up and demanding decency, dignity, equity, justice and a livable planet — they give me hope. May you receive the fullness of their energy, their commitment, their actions and their wisdom on Thanksgiving and beyond… I hope.